Rich, I'm sending the solutions now. For #14, we added the two simultaneous equations - the first one describing the forces on m and the second one describing the forces on M. The acceleration that M feels is a combination of the rope accelerating down (a sub b) and M accelerating down the rope at (a). When the two equations are added, that gives us an Ma that adds to a sub b, resulting in the M + m term. John
Brandon, I sent you my solution for #3.
As for 2c, we have the top block, a1, accelerating to the right as it is being pulled by the force, F. It has a friction force acting to the left due to block a2. That same friction force is pulling the bottom block, a2, to the right (Newton's Third Law).
Both accelerations were found relative to the horizontal surface.
So, in the reference frame of block 2, the acceleration of block 1 is a1 minus a2. That's what we need to calculate how long it would take to cover the distance L.
John
For question #14, do you have the block accelerating upwards in your answer? I had it accelerating downwards and have a - off from your answer. Also, I feel that the problem really should not have the ring accelerating WITH RESPECT TO THE ROPE. That is a very subtle difference.
Michael, for part c (I think that's what you're referring too), I set it up so the block is accelerating in a clockwise direction. Just chose it randomly. But, when we get the solution, if we let a = g, we get the block accelerating in a counter clockwise direction. And, why did you feel that the ring should not be referenced as accelerating with respect to the rope? I want to ensure I'm looking at this problem correctly and answering you properly. John
Daniel, at this time, we don't make them all available, but will send individual ones as you request.
John
Katherine Boutin • 6 months, 2 weeks ago
• login to reply
For question 2. When finding the acceleration of block m1 relative to the horizontal surface (m2), I got a1 =(F-mum1g)/m1 which is given in the answer key. For part C, why do we have to subtract the accelerations to find the acceleration relative to block m2? Isn't that what we found in part B? Thank you!
Katherine, that would be the acceleration relative to the ground. Since the bottom block is also moving to the right, the relative acceleration between the two blocks requires the subtraction. The bottom block is "running away" from the top block, so it takes longer for the top block to slide off the end. John
26 Comments